Teaching Evaluation
 
 
To be evaluated by PhD students who participated in the
​
Judge this part of the teaching program on each of the following:
 
1. General organisation (information, rooms, time)
     bad
  
  
  
  
good
2. Level of interest of the contents of the meeting
     bad
  
  
  
  
good
 
3. Workload prior to the meeting (preparation)
     bad
  
  
  
  
good
 

4. Organisation of the meeting (structure, coherence)
  bad
  
  
  
  
good
 
5. Relevance for your education in general as a scientist
low
  
  
  
  
high
 

6. Opportunity for you to participate
(participation in discussion, asking questions
low
  
  
  
  
high

7. Quality of the teaching and/or presentation
bad
  
  
  
  
good
8. Overall evaluation of the course/workshop
bad
  
  
  
  
good
 
9. [If applicable] Input from (foreign) guest
bad
  
  
  
  
good
 
 
10. If you have any comments and/or suggestions concerning this
part of the teaching program, please let us know below:
​
Thank you!